One has to know certain things about such practice. Perhaps it has its positive and negative sides. People will consider dying mainly as a result of their own problems which for this case can be due to a terminal illness. Several countries around the world object the idea. Nonetheless, there are those who have allowed its practice. Outlined below are some things to know pertaining to death with dignity pros and cons.
There is need to appreciate that people suffer so much as a result of the incurable illnesses. They should be given a go ahead to either voluntary or involuntarily end their lives. This is to enable them end the much suffering that they are going through due to this incurable diseases. Allowing them will end their distress which can be a terrible to them.
However, in as much as dying is inevitable the issue of physician assisted suicide has been rejected by almost every state. Even if the person to be injected with the lethal chemical, it is not at their liberty to die. Many court systems do not allow this to be conducted even if the individual is competent. This counters its practice claiming that it is not worthy.
Another support of this form of suicide is that people should never be forced to live. A lot of these individuals are very desperate due to the fact that they are going through hell. All they wish is to be granted the liberty to end their lives knowing that they cannot get well any more. This should be granted so as to end the suffering even if they are not competent.
Hindrance to this is the administration rules regarding the practice. As said earlier this is considered as a crime by many countries around the globe. This prevents the incurably sick persons from dying with their laws. This has caused uproar among the activists who assert that the administration denying the right to die is subjecting its people to endless anguish.
To stop the pain they should be tolerated. Tolerating it does not halt the provision of care that will prolong the lives of the sick. The competent should be given a chance to die if they can no longer endure the much pain they are in. The only noble thing to engage is euthanasia where one is given a hand to stop their living through a toxic jab.
If the practice is allowed to take charge the medics most probably will never take into account the significance of sedative care. It will become more rampant and these medics will opt to practicing the form of suicide more than giving a chance that will lengthen extend the time for dying. This is to say that the act should never be given a place in the society due the ethical issues surrounding it.
In conclusion, all the factors discussed above are what one should bear in mind. It is so tricky that they have to understand both sides of the argument. Thinking critically should be highly regarded here so as to determine what is best for people.
There is need to appreciate that people suffer so much as a result of the incurable illnesses. They should be given a go ahead to either voluntary or involuntarily end their lives. This is to enable them end the much suffering that they are going through due to this incurable diseases. Allowing them will end their distress which can be a terrible to them.
However, in as much as dying is inevitable the issue of physician assisted suicide has been rejected by almost every state. Even if the person to be injected with the lethal chemical, it is not at their liberty to die. Many court systems do not allow this to be conducted even if the individual is competent. This counters its practice claiming that it is not worthy.
Another support of this form of suicide is that people should never be forced to live. A lot of these individuals are very desperate due to the fact that they are going through hell. All they wish is to be granted the liberty to end their lives knowing that they cannot get well any more. This should be granted so as to end the suffering even if they are not competent.
Hindrance to this is the administration rules regarding the practice. As said earlier this is considered as a crime by many countries around the globe. This prevents the incurably sick persons from dying with their laws. This has caused uproar among the activists who assert that the administration denying the right to die is subjecting its people to endless anguish.
To stop the pain they should be tolerated. Tolerating it does not halt the provision of care that will prolong the lives of the sick. The competent should be given a chance to die if they can no longer endure the much pain they are in. The only noble thing to engage is euthanasia where one is given a hand to stop their living through a toxic jab.
If the practice is allowed to take charge the medics most probably will never take into account the significance of sedative care. It will become more rampant and these medics will opt to practicing the form of suicide more than giving a chance that will lengthen extend the time for dying. This is to say that the act should never be given a place in the society due the ethical issues surrounding it.
In conclusion, all the factors discussed above are what one should bear in mind. It is so tricky that they have to understand both sides of the argument. Thinking critically should be highly regarded here so as to determine what is best for people.
No comments:
Post a Comment