The development of living things and the universe at large has been a center of conflict between religious people and scientists. Christians believe that God created everything in a six day period as denoted in Genesis within the bible. Scientists believe evolution took place. In this perspective, several arguments against evolution theories have been advanced to reject the general scientific view.
The idea of living things being evolved from non living things beats the logic. This assumption is not possible and there is no evidence to support such claims. For life to come into existence there has to be parents of different gender. The others are just theories with no sustaining evidence to support their claim. Most of them are word of mouth.
Concerning the universe, there is no proof to show that it came into existence on its own. Neither could it have already been in existence before being formed. In the bible, God transformed it from the formless form into the way it is of now. Scientists perceive that it came into existence with a combination of gravitational forces which is not viable proof.
The point of gravitational force being capable to transform deformed things to well form items both in shape and positioning is unrealistic. With time, this force should have declined and this brings into question the existence of such a force. It is illogical to have such conclusions. Clarity in any form has to originate from a logical capacity; the question of existence of God in everything is the possible answer.
Changes occur from well organized matter to more deformed ones. These theories on the other hand state that the earth came about in the other way, matter being piled from disorganized manner to more organized ones. Such a scenario can only occur where there is intellect capacity to cause such organized formations. Without it, the others are mere speculations with no basis.
Others believe in mutation as the process which brought about human beings and other living things. Usually when matter mutates, it forms new generic materials. This does not support this theory in any way. Besides, the mutating matter cannot transform itself to something different from the original bodies. This point to the previous argument that matters usually moves from an orderly state to a disorderly one.
Others have their basis on cell division within the bodies of living things. This process is too slow. In addition to this, the new cell is simply a replica of the original matter. This beats logic of this theory where rampant division of cells could have brought about human beings.
With all these in place, arguments against evolution theories have turned to be more realistic. There is clarity and all the available pieces of evidence point to the existence of intellectual being who was organized in coming up with the entire creation. All these are therefore the works of God.
The idea of living things being evolved from non living things beats the logic. This assumption is not possible and there is no evidence to support such claims. For life to come into existence there has to be parents of different gender. The others are just theories with no sustaining evidence to support their claim. Most of them are word of mouth.
Concerning the universe, there is no proof to show that it came into existence on its own. Neither could it have already been in existence before being formed. In the bible, God transformed it from the formless form into the way it is of now. Scientists perceive that it came into existence with a combination of gravitational forces which is not viable proof.
The point of gravitational force being capable to transform deformed things to well form items both in shape and positioning is unrealistic. With time, this force should have declined and this brings into question the existence of such a force. It is illogical to have such conclusions. Clarity in any form has to originate from a logical capacity; the question of existence of God in everything is the possible answer.
Changes occur from well organized matter to more deformed ones. These theories on the other hand state that the earth came about in the other way, matter being piled from disorganized manner to more organized ones. Such a scenario can only occur where there is intellect capacity to cause such organized formations. Without it, the others are mere speculations with no basis.
Others believe in mutation as the process which brought about human beings and other living things. Usually when matter mutates, it forms new generic materials. This does not support this theory in any way. Besides, the mutating matter cannot transform itself to something different from the original bodies. This point to the previous argument that matters usually moves from an orderly state to a disorderly one.
Others have their basis on cell division within the bodies of living things. This process is too slow. In addition to this, the new cell is simply a replica of the original matter. This beats logic of this theory where rampant division of cells could have brought about human beings.
With all these in place, arguments against evolution theories have turned to be more realistic. There is clarity and all the available pieces of evidence point to the existence of intellectual being who was organized in coming up with the entire creation. All these are therefore the works of God.
About the Author:
Read more about Probable Arguments Against Evolution Theories visiting our website.
No comments:
Post a Comment